Parallelism improvement of Multi Cloud Services¶
Multi-Cloud runs Django by using Django’s built-in webserver currently. According to Django Document[Django_Document]_, this mode should not be used in production. This mode has not gone through security audits or performance tests, and should only be used in development. From test on local computer, this mode can only handle ONE API request at one time. This can not meet the performance requirement.
Although security and scalability might be improved as the side effect of resolving the performance issue, this spec will only focus on how to improve the parallelism(performance) of current MultiCloud API framework.
Django is a mature framework. And it has its own way to improve parallelism. Instead of running Django’s build-in webserver, Django APP can be deployed in some dedicated web server. Django’s primary deployment platform is WSGI[django_deploy]_, the Python standard for web servers and applications.
But on the other side, Danjgo is very huge. And Django is a black box if one doesn’t have good knowledge of it. Adding feature based on Django may be time-consuming. For example, the unit test[unit_test]_ of Multi-Cloud can’t use regular python test library because of Django. The unit test has to base on Django’s test framework. When we want to improve the parallelism of Multi-Cloud services, we need to find out how Django can implement it, instead of using some common method.
Besides, Django’s code pattern is too much like web code. And, most famous use cases of Django are web UI. Current code of Multi-Cloud puts many logic in files named views.py, but actually there is no view to expose. It is confusing.
The benefit of this solution is that most current code needs no change.
Given the fact that Django has shortcomings to move on, this solution propose to use a alternative framework. Eventlet[Eventlet]_ with Pecan[Pecan]_ will be the idea web framework in this case, because it is lightweight, lean and widely used.
For example, most OpenStack projects use such framework. This framework is so thin that it can provide flexibility for future architecture design.
However, it needs to change existing code of API exposing.
Performance Test Comparison¶
Apache Benchmark is used as test tool. It is shipped with Ubuntu, if you don’t find it, just run “sudo apt install -y apache2-utils”
2 Virtual Machine with Ubuntu1604. Virtual Machines are hosted in a multi-core hardware server. One VM is for Apache Benchmark. This VM is 1 CPU core, 8G mem. The other VM is for Multicloud. The VM is 4 CPU core, 6G mem.
ab -n <num of total requests> -c <concurrency level> http://<IP:port>/api/multicloud/v0/vim_types
It should be noted that data may vary in different test run, but overall result is similar as below.
100 requests, concurrency level 1¶
Command: ab -n 100 -c 1 http://<IP:port>/api/multicloud/v0/vim_types Result:
Django runserver: total takes 0.512 seconds, all requests success Django+uwsgi: totally takes 0.671 seconds, all requests success. Pecan+eventlet: totally takes 0.149 seconds, all requests success.
10000 requests, concurrency level 100¶
Command: ab -n 10000 -c 100 http://<IP:port>/api/multicloud/v0/vim_types Result:
Django runserver: total takes 85.326 seconds, all requests success Django+uwsgi: totally takes 3.808 seconds, all requests success. Pecan+eventlet: totally takes 3.181 seconds, all requests success.
100000 requests, concurrency level 1000¶
Command: ab -n 100000 -c 1000 http://<IP:port>/api/multicloud/v0/vim_types Result:
Django runserver: Apache Benchmark quit because it reports timeout after running a random portion of all requests. Django+uwsgi: totally takes 37.316 seconds, about 32% requests fail. I see some error says that tcp socket open too many. Pecan+eventlet: totally takes 35.315 seconds, all requests success.
Given the test result above, this spec proposes to use solution 2. Based on the consideration of Elastic API exposure[jira_workitem]_, Multi-Cloud will provide a new way to expose its API. That is to say, existing code of API exposing needs rewrite in [jira_workitem]. So the disadvantage of solution 2 doesn’t exist.
|[jira_workitem]||(1, 2) https://jira.onap.org/browse/MULTICLOUD-152|
To define a clear scope of this spec, VoLTE is the use case that will be used to perform test to this spec. All functionality that VoLTE needed should be implemented in this spec and [jira_workitem].
This spec will NOT change current API. This spec will NOT replace the current API framework in R2, nor will switch to new API framework in R2. Instead, this spec will provide a configuration option, named web_framework, to make sure use case and functionalities not be broken. Default value of the configuration will BE django, which will still run current Django API framework. An alternative value is pecan, which will run the API framework proposed in this spec. So users don’t care about the change won’t be affected.
No matter what API framework will be used, a WSGI Server needs to be provided. This spec will use Eventlet WSGI server. API framework will be run as an application in WSGI server.
Multi processes framework¶
This spec proposes to run Multi-Cloud API server in multiple processes mode. Multi-process can provide parallel API handlers. So, when multiple API requests come to Multi-Cloud, they can be handled simultaneously. On the other hand, different processes can effectively isolate different API request. So that, one API request will not affect another.
Managing multiple processes could be overwhelming difficult and sometimes dangerous. Some mature library could be used to reduce related work here, for example oslo.service[oslo_service]_. Since oslo is used by all OpenStack projects for many releases, and oslo project is actively updated, it can be seen as a stable library.
Number of processes¶
To best utilize multi-core CPU, the number of processes will be set to the number of CPU cores by default.
- Add WSGI server.
- Run Pecan application in WSGI server.
- Add multiple processes support.
- Update deploy script to support new API framework.